Why Are So Many Shooters Giving Up the Sport?

We know from Police figures that the number of firearm licence holders is fairly stable. But these latest numbers of surrendered licences could be an indication of why we are not growing.

noshoot

Is this noticeable increase simply due to an aging population?

Or to range closures?

Philip Alpers boasts that his successful harassment of shooters in Australia has drastically reduced their numbers. We must not allow that to happen here.

We must be wary of ANY seemingly innocuous new legislation that could cut our numbers and with it our voting power. Sadly we must always ask “How can this new rule be abused to harm our sport”.

One example would be changing secure gun racks for mandated safes. As Police are now demanding. In some areas, 30% of people rent. Landlords have the upper hand and don’t need to accept ANY hassle. So if a shooter needs to drill into a wall…. They wont get the property.

Or if a shooters moves a lot then the safe will be a constant hassle.

It all conspires, in subtle ways, to force a shooter to allocate their time and limited finances elsewhere.

f3

8 responses to “Why Are So Many Shooters Giving Up the Sport?”

  1. NSA finds that a number of (voluntary) surrenders are the result of revokation procedures where the licence holder does not have the wear-with-all to contest the often flimsy reason for the revokation but instead gives up the licence to be able to continue to shoot under supervision – which is not possible after a formal revokation of Licence. it is well to note that if firearms are ‘surrendered’ at the time of Licence surrender the Crown is liable to pay their value to the ex-licence holder.

    S28 (4) The Minister of Finance shall pay out of a Crown Bank Account compensation for the value of all firearms, pistols, or restricted weapons delivered to a member of the Police under this section and which have become the property of the Crown as hereinbefore provided.

    This is also another of the Ashburton ‘Toilet’ Case!

    Like

  2. The plan is to make shooting as difficult and costly (while avoiding a major political fight) as possible to prevent uptake of shooting by another generation and unless we come up with an effective counter to that we have lost. And be in no doubt the anti-gun mob are winning.
    Sure we had a win recently but it is only temporary as when we win it is just maintenance of the status quo and when they win it results in permanent legislative change. They can afford to lose a few but we cannot afford to lose any. If we sit on defence we lose. It is inevitable. We need to change the game completely and get a new generation onto the ranges and then holding firearms licences. That is going to take a pile of money and how to get that money is a good question.

    Like

    1. You have hit several nails on the head there

      Like

  3. yesterday i introduced 2 new shooters to the sport, suggest everyone tries to do the same

    Like

  4. @b, whats even better it was father and son (10 year old).

    Like

  5. Yes to Paul Clarke. So easy to bury your head and give up.

    Being positive about it and introducing one person a year to the sport is readily achievable. For goodness sake, who does not have a spare pair of ear defenders?

    Does the NSA have a guide for grooming someone? (-:

    Like

    1. Ya wanna get us ALL arrested!

      NSA firmly believes in individual responsibility and people being able to move forward and make decisions for themselves – NSA leads the way … just follow rather than expect an instruction booklet.

      Besides which a number have learnt about litigation from NSA efforts and the organisation is not exactly a ‘shooting club’ in the accepted sense – more of a Movement.

      Like

Leave a comment