Is The Police Response Rate To Firearm Thefts Good Enough?

The Kiwi Gun Blog received some more concerning information this week.

The first details the percentage of offenders who are even prosecuted for the possession of illegal arms:

thisone1.PNG

At first glance this number appears shocking. Fully 20% of offenders are not even charged for the illegal possession of a firearm.

In reality – these may be cases of ‘Grey guns’. Firearms held illegally BUT used for legitimate uses such as hunting to feed the family. The Kiwi Gun Blog are not in a hurry to have such people jailed.

They may not be able to get to ‘town’ to apply for a license. They may be intimidated by the process that they don’t understand. They may be illiterate and embarrassed by that. They may be concerned about an ancient crime committed when they were young.

What will be telling is the penalties handed down to those who WERE charged with this offence. We are waiting for that data now from the Justice Department.

The numbers that we have secured in the past were nothing less than infuriating. With judges often making even those pitiful sentences concurrent with those others resulting from the more serious offending of the criminal in question. So in effect – absolutely free.

The following numbers however are absolutely inexcusable:

thisone1.PNG

thisone1

So if you report your firearm stolen – fully 12% of cases will not even be attended by a Police officer. Of the cases that Police DO consider ‘Followed up’ – that may just be a phone call.

Yep. Our Police are SO concerned with firearm thefts that they cant be bothered even sending someone over to take prints. If they do – it may be days later and after evidence is lost.

We have heard of Police taking much longer than two days.

We have also heard a case from a reader that blew our minds….

A gun was stolen.

The Police refused to even accept the serial number that the owner had carefully recorded.

The victim then asked around and quickly identified the offender.

The victim then finds the scumbag thief posing with HIS firearm on Facebook!

This evidence is then given to Police who say “How do we know that it is YOUR gun?”

Lets see…. BY THE SERIAL NUMBER THAT YOU SLACK BASTARDS REFUSED TO TAKE?!!!!

Absolutely inexcusable.

No wonder Police bring only 8% of gun thieves to justice.

But Police still have time to arse about with new requirements for the ‘safe storage’ of our guns.

Our guns will never be safe as long as criminals have no fear of getting caught and even less fear of punishment. Its time to focus on the problem.

 

A reader sent us the following in response to our blog:

Many years ago (about 1990) a 9mm pistol and holster was stolen from my strongroom when my back was turned. I realised the theft as the offender left my premises and immediately contacted the Police with his name, vehicle details, etc.

They claimed they couldn’t locate him, and then a few weeks later two people were shot in the legs after a gang dispute.

A month or so later the pistol was found by a dog-walker in a riverbed near where the shooting had occurred. Meanwhile the holster and some fired cases were found in the backyard of a gang house.

It took over a year to get my pistol and holster back from the Police, and no one was ever charged despite me naming the thief.

f11

6 responses to “Is The Police Response Rate To Firearm Thefts Good Enough?”

  1. =you cant solve crime with a laser gun
    honestly the average nz cop isnt a bad guy but spends most of his day dealing with bullshit and in court watching judges hand out convictions that are pathetic

    Like

    1. Cant have it both ways… If they have time to enforce invented and illegal policy, if they can find the budget for nonsense ‘checks’ that serve no purpose, then they have what they need to do their actual job.

      Like

      1. Running with Scissors Avatar
        Running with Scissors

        The police response time for ‘little crimes’ (little in their minds, that affect little people) is nothing short of woeful. If a burglar steals something that took a month of my life to earn, he’she’it steals a month of my life. Police do not bother to attend or take notes, ‘just ring your insurance’. Yeah, right.

        To not attend a theft of a firearm promptly should make a mockery of Cahill’s claim that police are in danger from firearms, but our media won’t call him out of this as on much else.

        Today I drove from Northland to the Manawatu after visiting my dad. 13 camera vans or police cars with visible speed-checkers en route. But it’s not about a ticket quote. Yeah right…

        Like

  2. Paul Clarke said:
    “You can’t solve crime with a laser gun
    honestly the average NZ cop isn’t a bad guy but spends most of his day dealing with bullshit and in court watching judges hand out convictions that are pathetic.”

    I get the point about police associating bleating about gun danger and the inconsistent police response to gun thefts. Chris Cahill, please stop this hypocritical bleating.

    But in fairness to NZ Police, they are ENTIRELY correct to prioritise speeding drivers over gun thieves. Drivers kill many, many more innocent people in New Zealand than firearms ever did — any and every year! Killer drivers are far less likely than gun thieves to ever do time for the crime. And cops who are often first to attend the road carnage get to later attend court so they can also witness the guilty walk free. I can only guess at the detrimental effect this combination of mental trauma and frustrated justice has on cops’ mental health, never mind on that of the survivors.

    Like

    1. theres nothing wrong with traffic offences being prosecuted, but when all of a sudden its a holiday and tolerances drop to 4 km/h, you pass speed camera vans everwhere and cops with lasers it reeks of moneymaking

      Like

    2. They have time to harass us, they have time to do their job. The end.

      Like

Leave a comment